Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] Digital photography article

Subject: RE: [OM] Digital photography article
From: Jez.Cunningham@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 16:55:00 +0200
Yup - I agree, I'm going to be analog for a while yet.  Although I'll be in
Photokina on Thursday and expect to be drooling over the Oly D-SLR...
Jez





William Clark <wclark@xxxxxxx>@Zuiko.sls.bc.ca on 23-09-2002 04:34:25 PM

Please respond to olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sent by:  owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


To:   "'olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc:
Subject:  RE: [OM] Digital photography article


They do, but according to the owners of the shops here in Ottawa Canada,
hardly anyone uses them.  On our recent trip to PEI this summer (my wife is
from there) I saw no digital cameras.  All film.  Get this, I even saw an
OM1n and OM2n!!!!!  Film cameras' upfront cost is cheap relative to
digital, and this is what most people base their decisions on I think.

-Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: Jez.Cunningham@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Jez.Cunningham@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: September 23, 2002 10:16 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [OM] Digital photography article


Bill says:  Digital will never replace film until the AVERAGE person can
get photo qual prints without having a set-up at home.

Don't know about where you live, but round here the 1-hr shops increasingly
accept compact flash, smart-media, cdrom, etc etc and print 'conventional'
6x4 output.
Having said that, I'm sticking to Velvia.  (My scanner is just to play with
'cos I can't get prints (even off my Espon 870) that come anywhere close to
the impact of slides on a big screen...)
best regds,
Jez




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz