The Canon FS4000 has gotten good reviews and is much cheaper.
tOM
On Tuesday, August 13, 2002 at 20:09, Richard F. Man
<olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote re "Re: [OM] 4000 dpi scanner recommndations?" saying:
> FWIW, I like the LS-4000. I use NikonScan 3.1.2 and sometimes VS. All my
> online pictures (except the few that are taken with the C-3000) are scanned
> with it. I don't find dust to be a problem at all.
>
> At 09:56 PM 8/13/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> >I'm slightly considering upgrading from my Nikon LS-30 (2700 dpi) to a 4000
> >dpi machine. The Nikon LS-4000 is expensive (1500 USD) and uses a
> >lighting system that emphasizes dust - and I'm pissed at Nikon for their
> >software support of the LS-30 (and their dedicated software's human
> >interface is DREADFUL - thank heaven for Ed Hammrick and Vuescan).
> >Polaroid/Artix is a lot cheaper. Any other
> >thought/options/recommendations? I prefer those from personal experience.
> >I scan all three media - color negs, b&w negs, slides (including KR).
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Gary Edwards--
--------- http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Olympus-Documentation
--------- http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ottawa-photo-clubs
tOM Trottier, ICQ:57647974 http://abacurial.com
758 Albert St, Ottawa ON Canada K1R 7V8
+1 613 860-6633 fax:231-6115 N45.412 W75.714
"The moment one gives close attention to anything,
even a blade of grass, it becomes a mysterious,
awesome, indescribably magnificent world in itself --
Henry Miller, 1891-1980
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|