You seem to be a touch sensitive. I was not and did not insult you in any way.
I may have, on reflection, phrased my remark to read ' All photography
students...'
I was trying to make the point that newly enrolled students of photography will
learn more about B&W at first than anything else.
I do not appreciate being called a liar, but as it is you, I will make an
exception. If I need lessons on how to interact with people, I will take them
at the same time you take yours on "how not to jump to silly conclusions in an
effort to distract attention away from the fact that you are making a tit of
yourself."
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: ClassicVW@xxxxxxx
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 30 June 2002 15:18
Subject: Re: [OM] ( OM ) Photographic manipulation & Ansel Adams
Go back and read your own two replies that you made to me. You said my
position was a "losing argument" (when I clearly stated [at least twice] I was
just stating an OPINION) And you also phrased a couple of other comments in a
condescending way. ("if you were a student of photography....") All this to
attack someone's opinion.
You either are a liar, or need some lessons in how to interact with
people....
Either way, you may have the last word, as I am done with this thread, and
you.
George S.
Steve.Gullick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
Nope.
I was mereley offering you my opinions, experience and knowledge which you
chose to interpret as a personal insult when it was nothing of the kind.
|