G'day. You misunderstood me. I was not saying that my 100 can't be any
good because it has 5 elements! I was saying that I was wrong about "5
elements isn't enough". This tiny, amazingly sharp, 5 element 100/2.8 is
the only physical proof I need. I'm a believer.
Lamadoo
From: "Brian Swale" <bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> As they say in these here parts " It's the results that count, mate, and
if
> these haven't given you cause to worry before, then why worry now?"
>
> Maybe you've got a nicer one than you ever dreamed of.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|