frieder.faig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 09:35:50AM +0800, C.H.Ling wrote:
> >
> > I have not technically compared all lenses, but the 50/3.5 and 21/2 at
> > around 1:15 and F4 is much better than all other 50mms I have tested.
> > The 85/2 is obviously better than the 100/2.8 in close up. I don't
> > know if a heavy stop down will reduce the different.
>
> This is interesting. Especially because the 100/2.8 is also recommended
> as a good bellows lens in some literature. Have you examined /noticed
> a difference between crancked in /out, when using the 85/2 with extension?
>
> Frieder Faig
>
I rare use the non macro with extension, for the 85/2 may be just two
or three times. Extremely close up is always the job of my 80/4 and
135/4.5.
C.H.Ling
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|