Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: [OM] Fuji vs Kodak

Subject: Re: Re: [OM] Fuji vs Kodak
From: Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 09:11:30 +1000



> Olympus List <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Mike,
> 
> For my sister's wedding, the alleged "pro photographer" used Kodak
> Gold
> 100's.  I used Portra 160, and mine BLEW her's out of the water as
> far as
> trueness to skintones etc..  The Kodak Gold was very warm and being
> asian,
> we all turned brown...  The NPC 160 from Fuji was just as good, I

It's difficult to compare warm/cool with negative films when you consider that 
the  
colour balance can be readily changed at the printing stage.  I can't see that 
this 
was a valid comparison.

Wayne Harridge

http://members.optusnet.com.au/~w_harridge

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz