Well, I've been to Yellowstone, Bryce, Zion, Arches (too cool, that place)
and the Grand Canyon. I wasn't disappointed with the real thing at all. I
found that after I got home, had the many rolls of film processed and
returned, and looked at the pictures I took, *then* I was disappointed. I
looked at the pictures about 2-3 years later and was surprised at how good
they turned out. I guess the real image was still so strong in my mind
after I got back the pictures couldn't compare.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Charles Loeven
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 10:37 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] National Parks -was - TOPE: Landscapes
> >How many people have been to our national parks and have actually been
> >somewhat disappointed because they looked better in Ansel Adam's
> >photographs than they do in real life?
Only once. The Grand Canyon, although big was just a hole in the ground to
me.
Give me Zion or Sequoia any time.
Charlie
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|