Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] WAY [OT] ...Windows 2000 question...

Subject: RE: [OM] WAY [OT] ...Windows 2000 question...
From: Scott Gomez <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 20:30:00 -0800
It's also totally unnecessary. Every time I see something like this proposed
as an "easy solution" I get the shudders. With a little maintenance, Windows
2K is incredibly stable. It's been installed on my machine since it was
released and operating on my machine for months at a time without problem.
It's also installed and darned near maintenance free (other than updates) on
some 75 machines I service, and those are operated by kids! (At a school).
I've had exactly ONE reinstall in the time it has been available, and that
was due to a failed hard drive (Drive C: of a multidrive system).

---
Scott Gomez

-----Original Message-----
From: Mickey Trageser [mailto:vze3m2s8@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Subject: Re: [OM] WAY [OT] ...Windows 2000 question...

Ahhh, the convenience and reliability of Micro$oft.... I call that
intolerable.
-Mickey
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Boyce" <ericboyce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [OM] WAY [OT] ...Windows 2000 question...

> easy fix
>
<snip>
>
> I do this about every 3 months, to keep my system running tight :)
>
> Eric
>
> Main email
> ericboyce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: [OM] WAY [OT] ...Windows 2000 question..., Scott Gomez <=
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz