Shooting with XA will give you more confidence, you get more control
on focusing and exposure. With the Mju II I always get 2-3 out of
focus shots in a roll, my friend has the same founding. Although the
Mju II reported to have very high resolution but the pictures from it
doesn't look very nice in contrast, if I need auto everything compact
camera I will use my Yashica T4, the pictures look better than the Mju
II and focusing error was less.
C.H.Ling
"Daniel J. Mitchell" wrote:
>
> Any thoughts on this comparison? I realise the XA is a rangefinder, the
> Stylus is autofocus, so it's pretty much apples and oranges right from the
> start, but on the offchance anyone out there owns them both, I thought I'd
> ask..
>
> I'm looking for something very pocket-sized to carry around if I don't want
> to lug the OM with me, and while I have another manufacturer's camera that
> does the job, I've seen enough things extolling the virtues of the glass in
> these that I'm tempted.. They both seem to come in at about the same price,
> even.
>
> thanks,
>
> -- dan
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|