Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Zuiko 24mm/2.8 vs 28mm/2.

Subject: Re: [OM] Zuiko 24mm/2.8 vs 28mm/2.
From: "Olympus" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:53:43 -0800
I do keep that in mind Chip, so I'm getting rid of "this" 28mm/2.8, not
going to throw the baby out with the bathwater..  It doesn't mean I think
all Zuiko's suck, and will never buy one again..  But it's my hopes that my
28mm or 24mm will be razor sharp... regardless of brand..

Albert
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chip Stratton" <cstrat@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 11:38 AM
Subject: RE: [OM] Zuiko 24mm/2.8 vs 28mm/2.


> Keep in mind that there can be very marked sample to  sample differences
in
> the quality of image formed by any single lens model. If you have a 28/2.8
> which makes not so good pictures, it might just be the individual lens and
> not hold true for all samples.
>
> This was part of the driving force behind Gary Reese's very extensive
> testing effort of OM mount lenses - there was so much variation that he
> wanted to identify the  best sample to keep for his own use.  I don't know
> if this is true with all brands of lenses, or particularly with the
Zuikos,
> but you need to keep it in mind.
>
> Chip Stratton
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz