Jim,
Since no one else has piped up (pun intended) on this topic, I?ll give it a
go. I'm not sure I understand your question. The EPX76 is an equivalent of
the MS76. These have slightly higher internal impedance that the 357
variety, meaning that they will provide a slightly lower peak discharge
current. Other than in OM-2(n) models, I've never heard of anyone really
noting a difference in performance in OM cameras.
Kerry Frohling
Fullerton, California
Jim Terazawa also wrote:
> I recently acquired a brand new OM-3Ti in Tokyo
> while visiting my father there. In the box there was a
> set of packaged (sealed of course) silver oxide batteries.
> The batteries were packaged with the SONY brand, but
> the batteries themselves have Eveready EPX76 inscribed.
> Question: On the package printing the battery voltage
> is 1.55V. I am sure this sort of subject was discussed
> before such as 357 has lower internal impedance(?) but
> can someone kind enough to refresh me ? I looked at
> OM FAQ page
> http://brashear.phys.appstate.edu/lhawkins/photo/olympus.faq.html
> but I cannot find the specs for said batteries.
>
> I also went to local Radio Shack and asked the same
> question but the sales person insisted the EPX76 and
> the 357's have the identical 1.50V output ratings.
> They carried OEM by Varta (V357/V76P).
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|