ML Archiv: [OM] Re: Does this Qualify as a "Fang"

Olympus-OM

[OM] Re: Does this Qualify as a "Fang"

from DAVDOU9211

Subject:	[OM] Re: Does this Qualify as a "Fang"
From:	DAVDOU9211@xxxxxxx
Date:	Sat, 10 Nov 2001 20:52:32 EST

I went into a "Going out of Business" store today and found a NIB Olympus 1.4 
Case still in the Box in the celeophane wraper.  Gave the guy $5.00.  Did I 
do good?  I think so.

Dave Dougherty

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Re: Does this Qualify as a "Fang", DAVDOU9211 <= RE: [OM] Re: Does this Qualify as a "Fang", Chip Stratton Re: [OM] Re: Does this Qualify as a "Fang", Tom Scales Re: [OM] Re: Does this Qualify as a "Fang", bhinderks [OM] Need some advice also 24 shift almost FS, M. Royer [OM] What's the next lens for you?, Tom Scales Re: [OM] Re: Does this Qualify as a "Fang", Terry and Tracey Re: [OM] Re: Does this Qualify as a "Fang", Craig Henrikson Re: [OM] Re: Does this Qualify as a "Fang", Doggre Re: [OM] Re: Does this Qualify as a "Fang", DAVDOU9211 Re: [OM] Re: Does this Qualify as a "Fang", DAVDOU9211

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] PICS, C.H.Ling
Next by Date:	[OM] Tefnon zoom/macro lens for OM FS, Chris Linek
Previous by Thread:	[OM] Voightlander lenses, Brian Swale
Next by Thread:	RE: [OM] Re: Does this Qualify as a "Fang", Chip Stratton
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]