Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] E-10

Subject: Re: [OM] E-10
From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 15:07:06 -0600
In just a 10 second comparison, it probably compares more to the C4040 than
the E10. Not an SLR.  f/2.8-3.5 (vs. f/2-2.5)

I would like the wide angle and telephoto range.

Pretty darn slick for the money though.

Tom>
> --- Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > I'd guess I take 800f my photographs with a lens
> > between 18mm & 35mm so
> > I'd be disappointed.  Are there any digital cameras
> > which give the
> > equivalent of an 18mm in the 35mm format ?
> >
> > Wayne Harridge
>
> Has anyone seen a comparison between the E-10 and the
> new Minolta Dimage 5 or 7? The 7 has an equivalent 28
> to 200, which I would find eminently more usable than
> a 35 to whatever. With a 28 you could stitch together
> some panaramas which would at least partially
> alleviate the need for a 24, 21 or 18.
>
> Warren
>
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz