| Subject: | [OM] Any thing wrong with the OM2? |
|---|---|
| From: | Dean <dean-yoshizumi@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 28 Oct 2001 13:36:05 -0600 |
The recent discussion of the OM2n vs OM2 seems to suggest (of course I may be wrong) that the OM2n is the more sought after and liked camera. The differences that were pointed out between the two, however, seemed negligible. Is the OM2n much preferred over the OM2? If so, why? thanks. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] semi (ot) why the hell do people engrave things on cameras/lenses, Mike |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Lens sharpness, M. Royer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM2 or OM2n, John Hermanson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Any thing wrong with the OM2?, M. Royer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |