I agree completely. At least with the shift even if
you don't use the shift feature that much it still is
a great 24mm lens (albeit a bit slow a 3.5) I think
thats why the guy is selling it in barely used
condition. Only place it might see consistent use is
in scientific applications, which turns it into lab
equipment rather than photo gear.
Mark Lloyd
--- andrew fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> A shift I could use and use but I can't really think
> of a use for a full
> circle fisheye once the novelty has worn off.
> Seriously expensive toy,
> but....what is the point?
> AndrewF
>
>
>
>
> >I've never seen a fisheye up for sale. Man it looks
> >beautiful. Almost makes me wish I had saved my
> money
> >and hadn't bought the shift....ALMOST... That said
> I
> >know my dreams are unreasonable, after all how many
> >times would I actually use a fisheye. Still no lens
> I
> >know of has the coolness factor of a fisheye. Say
> has
> >anyone ever seen that Nikon 5.6mm fisheye up for
> sale.
> >The one that weighs 50 pounds and, while the
> neatest
> >looking lens I've ever seen, looks like it has no
> >practical use and has, "Scratch Me" written all
> over
> >it
> >
> >Mark Lloyd
>
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing
> List >
> < For questions,
> mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page:
> http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|