On Thu, 20 September 2001, Tris Schuler wrote:
>
>
> >Since this topic is still going and is at least on topic, I'll add my
> >input. I would choose the OM-4Ti and the 35/2. I would really, really
> >miss the 100/2, but my experience is that you can more often than not get
> >closer, but it's sometimes impossible to get farther away. And, oh, how I
> >would miss the macro capability of other lenses.
>
> Disagree. It's far more often the case that you can't get close enough.
>
> Tris
>
Depends on how bold you are. Ever had your back to a wall and still couldn't
include everything you wanted in the frame? Even if you can't get as close as
you want, you can always crop and enlarge. And the 35/2 is one helluva great
lens, one of the best of the Zuikos. Getting closer, unless physically
impossible, is sometimes just a matter of cojones.
Walt Wayman
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"They who would exchange freedom for a little safety deserve neither."
Benjamin Franklin
------------------------------------------------
"Get your free e-mail at http://www.myNRA.com";
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|