I don't see anything below a necessary.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> Since it is public now, I think we should discuss the possibility of a
> moderator openly. I also think that now that the list is closed lets keep
it
> closed. No more discussion of opening it again. If anything we should talk
> about further security measures.
>
> Here are my suggestions:
>
> 1. Now that we have control of subscriptions I think I might say that I
think
> off topic posts should be completely eliminated. I know this won't be
popular
> but it's the only way that we can totally bang any flames on the head
> immediately.
>
> 2. I also think this should mean that an individual should be able to be
> forcefully unsubscribed if they breach this rule 3 times in a week.
>
> 3. Decisions on unsubscribing someone should be made by a disciplinary
team of
> three. The OM trinity if you would. I have nominated to be on this panel
and
> two others would need to apply. Maybe these can be rotating positions. I'm
> happy to do it forever as long as I am subscribed to the list, so maybe
the
> other two can rotate.
>
> 4. Introduction of a new beginners list. Newbies should be thoroughly
vetted
> on this new list for a period of 18 months before they can join the older
> elite list. I for one don't like sharing the same space with people who
ask
> annoying questions we've answered for the umpteenth time.
>
> And yes I am glad that the list is closed to spammers and outsiders who
have
> no interest in Olympus OM. Bye bye Snow White and long live the democratic
> principles on which this list is based.
>
> Dave
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|