----------
From: DAVDOU9211@xxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:44 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: DAVDOU9211@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] Galen Rowell on Olympus
In a message dated 8/17/01 8:40:05 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
msvphoto@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> To
> actualy claim a plastic N90 could possibly be more durable or
reliable
> than an OM-4 tells me he is a walking Nik*n ad.
>
>
>We have to remember that Galen Rowell is very successful and has
worked hard
>to get where he is. That may in part justify his ego. I suspect
that one
>could use a 4t to pound an N90 into rubble and take a picture of the
debris
>with the 4t when you were done. So I agree with your comment Mike.
Dave Dougherty
But you will also need pictures of the 4t or else people won't know
what did the job.
So quickly run a roll of film through the N90 showing the 4t in all
its glory, remove
the roll , and then proceed..
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|