Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 18mm vs 16mm

Subject: Re: [OM] 18mm vs 16mm
From: Jim Couch <JamesBCouch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:51:35 -0700
The 18 is a great lens for scenics/landcapes/interiors. It is a
'rectilinear'  so it does not distort the image like the 16, which is a
full frame 'fish eye' The 16 is designed to curve any line that is not
throught the exact center of the frame.

Jim Couch

Chris Barker wrote:

> Can anyone tell me what the 18/3.5 is really for?  You see it comes
> between the 21 and the 16, is pretty expensive in the UK, yet has
> only (yes, I know, "only") 100deg angle of view compared with 180deg
> for the 16 and 92deg for the 21.
>
> I am sure that it is a decent little lens (aren't they all?), but
> what is it *for*?
>
> The real purpose of my question is to decide whether to go for the 16
> or 18 when the disease/addiciton hits again... ;-).
>
> Chris


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz