My AT-X is all metal, and solidly constructed. The extender has matched glass
elements. All done without apparent compromise compared to Zuiko.
Larry
Chip Stratton wrote:
> I've owned a Tamron 90mm/2.5 macro lens, and agree that it is an outstanding
> lens optically, giving up nothing in sharpness/contrast to a lens like the
> Zuiko 90mm/2 - I liked mine a lot.
>
> But, to get it to a good price point, they do compromise a bit on
> construction compared to the Zuiko or Leica - on my example the focusing
> helicoid had a tiny bit of slop, and of course the lens body is of
> polycarbonate and not metal (though I understand an earlier Tamron did have
> a metal body). There are other aspects too which are done less expensively.
> These shortcuts usually won't keep you from getting the goods, though.
>
> A Yugo will get you from Point A to Point B as effectively as a Mercedes 99%
> of the time, but the experience is not going to be quite the same. You can
> look at your camera gear in a similar fashion. Though I'm not about to shell
> out $2800 for the Leica experience, I was able go for a $550 Zuiko to
> replace my $150 Tamron, and I haven't regretted it. We all have differing
> comfort zones.
>
> Chip Stratton
>
> > > And what a bargain considering that the inferior Leica R 100/macro
> > > sells for $2800. How do those 3d party guys do it? ;-)
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|