| Subject: | Re: [OM] opinions of short Olympus teles |
|---|---|
| From: | "John Pendley" <jpendley@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Jul 2001 17:20:59 -0400 |
> Hi Michael: > > the 135 mm f/3.5 is is nice lens. It is very small and light I could not agree more. I just wrote somebody that I'd never be w/o the 85/2.0; well, this is another one, if not quite as exciting as the 85. It's still a terrific lens, I think. JP < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] opinions of short Olympus teles, M. Sparks |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 21mm f/3.5 (was Re: [OM] 50 1.2 at Cameta), Tom Scales |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] opinions of short Olympus teles, Bill Stanke |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] opinions of short Olympus teles, Tom Scales |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |