on 7/20/01 10:26 AM, Tom Scales at tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Then don't ever play with one. You'll never give it up. I love mine
>
> Tom :)
>
> From: "Walt Wayman" <HIWAYMAN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Yes, but that makes an f/10 zoom, and it's big, and heavy. I would never
> consider the 50-250/5. Not ever. :)
>
> Walt
>
I'm trying to decide about an 85-250/5.0 lens... what are the differences
between that and the 50-250/5.0 or the 65-200/4.0 lens? Are there enough
distinct differences that I should have one of each, or should I have one if
each just because...?
I gotta quit throwing out these softball questions!
--
Jim Brokaw
OM-1's, -2's, -4's, (no -3's yet) and no OM-oney...
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|