ML Archiv: [OM] 18/3.5

Olympus-OM

[OM] 18/3.5

from Tom Scales

Subject:	[OM] 18/3.5
From:	"Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 20 Jul 2001 20:43:13 -0500

Very.  It is a wonderful lens.  Very wide angle, but not a fisheye.  Easy to
use. Surprisingly small.

Required for a true Zuikoholic's collection <g>.

Tom

> How about the 18mm f3.5? Is it good?
>
> At 12:29 PM 7/19/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Memphis area members, Mike Williamson Re: [OM] Memphis area members, Tom Scales Re: [OM] Memphis area members, Mike Williamson [OM] 16/3.5 fisheye, gries Re: [OM] 16/3.5 fisheye, johnsonpa Re: [OM] 16/3.5 fisheye, John Hermanson Re: [OM] 16/3.5 fisheye, Tom Scales Re: [OM] 16/3.5 fisheye, Richard F. Man [OM] 18/3.5, Tom Scales <= Re: [OM] 18/3.5, Richard F. Man Re: [OM] 18/3.5, Jim Brokaw Re: [OM] 16/3.5 fisheye, John A. Lind Re: [OM] 16/3.5 fisheye, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] 16/3.5 fisheye, John A. Lind Re: [OM] 16/3.5 fisheye, C.H.Ling [OM] 18/3.5 falloff [was] 16/3.5 fisheye, John A. Lind Re: [OM] 16/3.5 fisheye, Tris Schuler RE: [OM] 16/3.5 fisheye, gries [OM] 18 vs. 16, Tom Scales

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] 4 or 4T?, Chris Charlton
Next by Date:	[OM] Soligor Winders for OM Cameras?, Curtis P. Hedman
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] 16/3.5 fisheye, Richard F. Man
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] 18/3.5, Richard F. Man
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]