I offered a 200/4 with case a couple of days ago. Didn't get a response.
It's still available for US$125 plus shipping, but goes on *-Bay tonight.
Last call, folks! Offline replies, please.
Regards,
Chris
On 12 Jul 2001, at 9:23, Jim Couch wrote:
> The 85 f2 is plenty sharp, especially when stopped down a couple of stops.
> I would not worry about it at all. It is a wonderful lens! I have not tried
> it with the 2x-A myself so I can't comment on that. However, if you are
> looking for a longer focal length you can get a Zuiko 200 f4 which is also
> a wonderful lens for les than the cost of a 2x-A in equivelanet condition.
>
> Jim Couch
>
> gries wrote:
>
> > Dear enablers:
> >
> > I am looking to purchase (in the near future) a short telephoto for
> > capturing architectural details. I was figuring that the 85/2 would do
> > since this is the focal length that seems to look the best to my eye, but
> > now you have me concerned about the sharpness. Any opinions on which one
> > to get? What is the relative performance of the 100/2.8, and how does
> > the 85/2 perform w/ the 2x-A? any and all help is appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > gries
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
---
I'm *not* a Zuikoholic.... I'm a Zuikohobbiest!
Chris O'Neill (chris@xxxxxxxxx)
http://www.joinco.ca
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|