Since I just got the one a week ago, I don't have any thoughts based on long
term usage. They are probably so close in resolution and contrast that I
doubt I could tell the difference. Even so, I just did a side by side
comparison of the same still life. Won't know the results for a while, I'm
shooting slide film very slowly these days.
Ángel Lobo wrote:
>
> Hello Steve and all.
>
> My chrome 28 f 3.5 is 191xxx and the black ring 353xxx.
> Serial numbers and coating relections similar than yours.
>
> Do you have a side by side comparison of your lenses?
> Which one is better, on your opinion ?
>
> I think on f 8 the chrome one is better. (Even best than 28 f 2.8).
>
> Ángel Lobo.
> CUENCA (Spain).
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Steve Goss <steveg3@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> > Lens one:
> > Silver nose 28/3.5, serial #1634xx. Both of the coating reflections
> > appear purplish, one more blue, the other more pinkish.
> >
> > Lens two:
> > Black nose 28/3.5, serial #4443xx. One of the coating
> > reflections appears purplish, the other quite yellow. >
>
> > Thanks, Steve Goss, Dallas Tx usa
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|