http://www.skipwilliams.com/albums/om-lit/pages/Zuikos-1974.htm.
- That 75-150/4 on Skips photo doestn't look right. Isn't it the old 200/5?
An early prototype of a 75-150?
- Is that larger lens behind the the OM1 a 180/2.8 or a 200/4? What's the
smaller lens behind the OM1? (both 200/4 and 200/5? So where is the
180/2.8?)
- That 35 shift does look different from what I recall ...
- There are about 3 or 4 lenses that look like the 100/2.8 or 85/2 ....
Can we tag all these lenses?
Getting even more confused,
Daan
Pictures of Insects at:
http://www.kalmeijer.net
> I was looking through some old literature that I have from 1974 and I
> noticed a version of the 135/4.5 Macro that I hadn't noticed before. If
> you look on this page:
> http://www.skipwilliams.com/albums/om-lit/pages/Zuikos-1974.htm. You'll
> see the unusual lens with the wide ribbed focusing ring. I guess that
it's
> mounted on a 25mm extension tube or something, since the Auto-tube wasn't
> invented yet.
>
> Noted also are the prototype lenses 400/4.5, 300/6.3, and 18/3.5 L-Zuiko
> that were never marketed.
>
> Skip
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|