Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] ........21's.........

Subject: Re: [OM] ........21's.........
From: "Charles Geilfuss" <cgeilfuss@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 19:17:36 -0000
Greetings,
I can't speak of the 21/2 since I don't own one but I do have a 21/3.5 which is a very good and useful lens. As with all super-wides the perspective is tricky to control and composition is critical. For number comparison I refer you to Gary Reese's Lens Test Page.

Charlie Geilfuss


From: "tmlee" <clairetm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: "Zuikies & Zuikettes" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [OM] ........21's.........
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 22:28:14 +0800

Dear friends........
Whats the score on the 21/2 vs the 21/3.5..... ? Is the f2 really good and
worth splurging on or is the  f3.5 good enough ?

There is one 21/2 exc + costing US$675.......... is it worth it ?

Peace
TMLee




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz