Opps! I forgot to mention that the 24/2.8 goes for 'round US$200 or
thereabout. Sorry!
Chris
On 5 Feb 2001, at 7:48, Chris O'Neill wrote:
> If you've got more money to spend, I recommend the 24/2.8 wide angle. A
> bit "fussier" about perspective (lining things ups so that vertical lines
> remain perpendicular), but has *great* perspective and field of view and
> darned nice contrast and resolution.
---
I'm *not* a Zuikoholic.... I'm a Zuikohobbiest!
Chris O'Neill (coneill@xxxxxxxxxxx)
http://www.nucleus.com/~coneill
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|