| Subject: | [OM] Close-up lenses |
|---|---|
| From: | *- DORIS FANG -* <sfsttj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 15 Jan 2001 12:23:39 -0500 (EST) |
I know it's been discussed here before, but if someone could steer me
to URLs or posts that addressed the issue of how some lenses do better
with high-quality achromat CU lenses than with tubes, and most importantly
WHY, I'd appreciate it. Please reply off-list.
*= Doris Fang =*
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] The London Eye, Chris O'Neill |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] is this distortion? what kind?, WKato |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Serial #s [was] Lens Coatings, John A. Lind |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] Serial #s [was] Lens Coatings, Chip Stratton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |