I rerally prefer the 24 over the 28. the wider perspective is really nice
to have most of the time. If I don't want to use the 24wa then I almost
always use a 35. You do have to be more careful with horizons, and other
straight lines with the 24, but the results are wonderful!
For a couple of 24 of mine see:
http://home.earthlink.net/~spknsprkt/wsnC26F.html
there are three 24mm shots on this page. The loading is a bit slow, but I
think you might find the shots interesting. There is also a shot using
the 35-70 f3.5-4.5 zoom that was shot at 35mm.
Jim Couch
Albert Yang wrote:
> I am going to Taiwan, and so I want to take lots of pics, and I want
> to add a wide angle lens to the bag before I head out.
>
> I see that the 28mm are cheap compared to the 24mm's... So a had a
> few questions...
>
> Do you see any barrelling in the 24mm at all? I've seen some high
> quality lenses (Zeiss) which doesn't show any distortion at all, and
> I have seen some crappy 24mm lenses (some old C*non stuff) which
> should considerable barrelling at this length of lens. I would like
> the widest lens possible, but not at the cost of distortion...
>
> My second question then would be, how much of a different between the
> 24mm am I going to notice with a 28mm? Also, how is the quality (in
> general) of the 28mm f3.5?
>
> Thanks.
> Albert
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|