Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] To or not to CLA that is the question

Subject: Re: [OM] To or not to CLA that is the question
From: clintonr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 10:57:32 -0600
Just two suggestions:

1. Use it more (that's actually better then using it less - occasional
operation keeps the switches from oxidizing), and

2. if it quits working properly, get it fixed - no sooner.  IOW, if it
ain't broke - you know the rest!

OK, three suggestions:

3. Keep your equipment clean - gently brush away any
dust/dirt/sand/debris with an old, clean, dry (!) toothbrush.




atk@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> I have an OM 2sp. I am the original owner. I think the camera was purchased
> in late 84 or early 85. I could probably find the receipt if it matters.
> 
> The camera receives regular but low usage (around 3 to 5 rolls of film a 
> year).
> It has never been CLA. The seals on teh back are turning to mush but still 
> work.
> I had the shutter checked at the photo show last weekend (Hunts in boston) and
> they guy there said it was dead on as was the meter.
> 
> I really like this camera and would be very upset if anything happened to it.
> Is there any harm in NOT having it CLA? Is there any harm in having it CLA ?
> 
> Given  that the camera appears to be in perfect working order do I really want
> to risk having it taken apart to be cleaned ?
> 
> I do know that a few grains of sand from time to time has gotten into the
> camera but it doesn't seem to be too bad...
> 
> Alan
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz