Hi,
I find the high contrast "problem" of the zuiko lenses quite interesting.
You know that it is there and you have to use that as an adventage.
But the diference is quite evident.
On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Keith Berry wrote:
> Toni Campos wrote:
> > I'd like to know if any list's member can shows me lenses with moderate
> > contrast from the Zuiko's. I bought a 50mm f/1.4 >1,000,000 and I found it
> > very contrasty - that's not what I like on a lens, I prefer that ones with
> > moderate contrast instead.
>
> Me too, Toni. I remember being appalled by the excessive contrast when I had
> the first results from the MC 50/f1.8 that I bought because it was not what
> I was used to from a 50mm Zuiko, but I've now come to terms with the idea
> that I can use the MC version in dull weather and the 'real' one in sunny
> conditions.
>
> The original range of Zuikos were multicoated *only* when necessary - wide
> primes and zooms - and Olympus only jumped on the multicoat-everything
> bandwagon in response to the competition. So stick to lenses from the
> original range and avoid the non-essential MC versions. When scanning
> pictures, it's easy to increase contrast digitally, but if shadow and/or
> highlight detail has been lost due to excessive contrast, you can't recover
> it.
>
> I've just had my Olympus 35RD test film prints back and they're of
> delightfully low contrast with detail in both shadows and highlights even
> though many were taken in harsh, low sunlight. Whether or not that's caused
> by the rear element scratch (there are no signs of any other effects), I
> don't mind, and have decided to keep the camera.
>
> Regards,
> Keith Berry
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|