Tom -- WRONG ! -- The camera is clearly a "NO - backward'K"- IN" That is --
NO KIN to an Olympus!
(I know - pretty weak -- but it's raining, cold, etc...)
Craig
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 8:21 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] bokeh...
> But, but (sputter, sputter), the camera is ah, ah, on no, I'm passing
> out......N*K*N!
>
> Tom
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Acer V" <siddim01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Zuikoholics (In)Anonymous" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 3:19 AM
> Subject: [OM] bokeh...
>
>
> > a ha, i finally found an example of the shot i had ideally wanted to
> > submit had it worked as i wanted.... a reflection of some scene,
> > still-life, in my watch crystal. note the watch pictured, an Omega. I'm
a
> > die hard omega fanatic.... but far from being to afford one.
> >
> > http://home.wtal.de/cpm/ra/omega/nikon.jpg
> >
> > is that way cool or what? pity my attempts weren't even close (and i had
> > the idea long before i came across this pic) back to the drawing board.
> >
> > /Acer V
> > --
> > dum spiro, spero
> > http://student.ucr.edu/~siddim01
> >
> >
> > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> >
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
