Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM: 35-70 lens

Subject: Re: [OM] OM: 35-70 lens
From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 21:07:20 -0500
Ooh ooh, I know the answer to this one. (Did I sound like Horshack,
huh,huh,huh...ok, so maybe that only means something to 40 year Americans.)

35-70/3.5-4.5.  No question.  Just don't get snookered with the 3.5-4.8,
which is a Cosina and, well, not as good.

The f/4 and f/3.6 are excellent lenses, but the 3.5-4.5 is smaller and
lighter and just a wonderful little lens.

Course, I'm behind in reading, so this has probably been answered by 40
other people, unless they're caught up in the gun thread.

<snip>


>   At the risk of starting a firestorm: excluding the 35-80/2.8, which is
the
> best of the short focal length telephoto lenses (35-70)? Ignore the
> differences in filter size.
>
> Charlie Geilfuss
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
> Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> http://profiles.msn.com.
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz