Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Zuiko 24/f2.8 compared to the Zuiko 28/f2.8

Subject: Re: [OM] Zuiko 24/f2.8 compared to the Zuiko 28/f2.8
From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 15:26:04 -0500
As the owner (in some cases former owner) of all of these, my vote would be
for the 35-70 and 75-150 pair. I think they're more versatile and, more
importantly to me, they're lighter.  Hey, I own the 35-80/2.8 and still use
the 35-70/3.5-4.5 a lot more.

My 'small kit' is usually:

21/2
35-70/3.5-4.5
75-150/4
90/2 Macro
OM-4T

Tom

> On 6 Sep 2000, at 12:21, John A. Lind wrote:
>
> > If it's three you want to pack, you might try this combo:
> >   24/2 or 2.8
> >   35-105/3.5~4.5
> >   135/2.8
>
> Not considering the quality of the glass (cuz I don't own any of them),
> and not including the 24/2 or 2.8 (cuz I'm assuming you'd want that one
> anyway for the "super wide" angle), here's how the prices and weights
> line up (using the ranges given on the Unofficial Olympus OM Zuiko
> Lens Page):
>
> 35-105/3.5~4.5 = US$270 - US$365 (weight = 470g)
> 135/2.8 = US$90 - US$170 weight = 360g)
>
> for a combined total cost of around US$360 to US$535 and weighing in
> at 830g).  On the other hand...
>
> 35-70/3.5~4.5 = US$160 - US$200 (weight = 190g)
> 75-150/4 = US$80 = US$170 (weight = 440g)
>
> for a combined total cost of around US$240 to US$370 and weighing in
> at around 630g).
>
> With the latter combination you get a range of 35 to 150 instead of 35 to
> 105 plus a 135 prime, and it all weighs just under 200g less.
>
> So, my question would be is there a big enough difference in the
> "quality" of the first combination to make it worthwhile spending the
> extra couple hundred bucks and carrying the extra weight???  Or, is the
> latter combination "good 'nuff" unless you're either a pro, have an
> employer that's paying the tab, or like some of us can afford more
> expensive toys???  <G>
>
> Just wondering...
>
> Chris
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> Chris O'Neill (coneill@xxxxxxxxxxx)
> Web:  http://www.nucleus.com/~coneill
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz