Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

SV: [OM] Questions about a 350 F2.8

Subject: SV: [OM] Questions about a 350 F2.8
From: "Helge M Tonning" <kristin.helge@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 20:14:21 +0200
Hi,

If you remember, Tom Scales purchased a fairly big Oly package from Norway some 
weeks ago. I was the guy helping him in Norway, and I still got the 350 F2.8 
besides me, awaiting shipment to Austin, Texas. (No, I wont tell you when and 
how...:-) 
The 350 is really a stunning lens, and very versatile too, despite of it's 
size. (as a courtesy Tom let me play with the lens for some time, thanks Tom)
This specimen got a rear 46mm filter marked: Olympus rear 46mm Neutral - Japan. 
According to the seller this filter was delivered as a standard filter together 
with the lens and the aluminium case.
I'm going to cry and beg for mental help when I have to part with this lens in 
near future... :-((((

Helge

-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: GFaulk7376@xxxxxxx <GFaulk7376@xxxxxxx>
Til: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Dato: 29. august 2000 06:27
Emne: [OM] Questions about a 350 F2.8


>I've unlurked tonight in order to draw from the experience of the Olympus 
>list members. I stumbled upon a 350 for sale in the Houston, Texas, area and 
>after examining it and looking through it with my OM1, I've got a few 
>questions I'd like to pose to the list. First off, the front element has 4 or 
>5 one inch long scratches that do not appear to be very deep, but are easily 
>visible when viewed from the front of the lens and are also visible when 
>viewed from the lens mount end. The scratches were not visible through the 
>viewfinder of my OM1. I know most people claim that scratches affect resale 
>value a lot more than image quality, but when one is about to spend $2k on a 
>lens, the scratches do take on importance.  There are also quite a few black 
>specks visible inside the lens. The owner indicated that the lens had been 
>stored and used without the rear filter for over 7 years. He wasn't aware 
>that a rear filter was to be in place at all times and claimed the 1a filter 
>included with the lens made photos too pink. I seem to recall the 350 I once 
>had had a clear UV filter as standard equipment and not a 1a. You 350 owners 
>out there, which filter did your lens come with? One area of small concern is 
>that the end of the tripod mount sometimes rubs against the lens body.  
>Anyway, if I pass on the lens, I'll mention this list to the owner. Thanks 
>for your input.
>
>Gary Faulkenberry
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz