| My only experience with a Mac so far has been setting up my mom's Color 
Classic, and with no prior Maxperience I was surprised at how simple it was 
to get the hang of.  The only trick was learning the lingo - different terms 
for the same thing.  And a few concepts are a bit different.  I'd happily 
take an iMac DV, 'cept for that stupid mouse. 
I've used PCs since Day One, only because it was necessary for work.  I'm 
not a fan nor do I revile 'em - they could be worse.  Regarding Windon't, I 
still use Win95 'cause I got fed up with the bugs and resource hogging of 
Win98. 
OTOH, I've had zero problems configuring scanners (parallel port and USB) to 
work with the two PCs in our household.  Yeah, I know about the potential 
problems with BIOS, IRQ, drivers, blah-blah-blah, but in many cases the real 
culprit is the company/person who put the machine together.  The beauty (?) 
of the PC is the ability to make it into whatever you want - within reason. 
But, ya gotta consider the big picture - sometimes it's better to choose 
components that are more industry-standard, even if it means sacrificing a 
bit of performance. And I'm not a big performance hog - my main PC is still 
a puny 90MHz Pentium with a mere 40MB RAM.  Works fine for producing 
webworthy images, tho' I wouldn't want to tackle 20MB TIFFs with it.  The 
other house PC is a 300MHz Pentium with 64MB RAM, but it lacks some of the 
sophisticated innards of the other, like a video card configurable for color 
calibration, etc.  I'm never sure that images scanned and edited on it will 
look right to others.  And, to make matters worse, the monitor went all 
greenish yesterday.  Guess the blue gun went kaput. 
OM content?  Uhhh ... all the pix I've taken with my OM-1 and scanned into 
the PC look *really* great.  Lame, I know, but the best I can come up with 
on short notice. 
For any photographer who wants to share his/her images with the webworld, 
it's hard to beat the plug 'n' go (I ain't applying PNP to the Mac) 
convenience and overall standardization of the Mac.  But ... and this is a 
big but ... first time computer owners still seem to have more problems 
getting a Mac (even the iMac) online than first time PC owners.  Dunno why 
that is. 
Lex
===
 
From: RobBurn@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] Re: Scanner woes and lack of them on Apple Mac
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 07:56:33 EDT
In a message dated 8/17/00 1:37:54 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
lexjenkins@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
<< I like 'em both, altho' my MacFondness is fairly recent.  I'd happily 
take
 any suitable Mac and dedicate it to graphics work, while keeping a PC 
handy 
 for web work and other chores. >>
My two cents worth.
Been a Mac user since the Mac Plus. Currently use a Performa 6360 with 
450MHz 
G3 L2 cache upgrade, 128Mb memory. Works great! Recently built myself a
450MHz , 256Mb PC100 memory, 13,6 Gb HD PC because I use a PC at work.
 
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
 |