Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM-1 vs.OM-1n vs. OM-2n

Subject: Re: [OM] OM-1 vs.OM-1n vs. OM-2n
From: GMcGrath@xxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2000 09:04:21 EDT
Welcome to the list, Frank!

The only real advantage of the 1 or 1n would be that they will operate if the 
battery is dead, but you would lose the meter w/o the battery, and all 
exposure settings have to be made manually with or without the battery 
working. This camera is especially useful for those who visit remote 
locations where batteries might not be available, who work in very cold 
conditions where batteries might not function, or for long time exposures, 
due to its mirror lockup feature.

The 2n has the advantage of aperture-preferred OTF exposure, which is 
especially useful with flash photography. OTF will give you more good 
exposures without the labor of calculating flash settings manually. The 
Olympus OTF exposure system has been praised for its accuracy since its 
introduction.

HTH,
Greg

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz