I'm tempted to utter a profanity like "What absolute horseshit!" but I don't
wish to offend anyone, so I'll refrain.
Personally, I've generally stopped taking nudie cuties of kidlets between
ages 2 and 3, just because those in my family are usually dressed most of
the time by then. I still take cuties, tho'.
Here's my idea of a sexy photo - others may choose their own fetish:
http://www.photographyreview.com/viewfinder/messages/7525.html
-----------
Lex Jenkins
-------------------------------------------------------------
Visit "Vistas Tejas" at http://www.photoscene.com/lexjenkins/
<a href="http://www.photoscene.com/lexjenkins/";>Visit Vistas Tejas</a>
======================================================================
From: Garry Lewis <glewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [OM] [OT] And for Your Next Assignment
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 13:10:40 -0500
Take under advisement
http://www.apbnews.com/newscenter/breakingnews/2000/03/07/kidporn0307_01.html
The old world of "artistic expression" longer exists when it comes to
child nudity. Be careful,
an innocent serendipitous photo could land you a legal stigmata of child
abuser and panderer.
yours understanding the fear of lost childhood, but fearing the scared mob
mentality,
Garry D. Lewis
--
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|