John Lind wrote:
>I think you will be pleased with both the 200/4 and 300/4.5 lenses. I've
>hand held the 200/4; it's light and small enough, but it's also at the
>limit of what I can hold steady in a well braced stance. The 300 is
tripod
>only, and I'd try to use the 2X-A with 135/2.8 if I needed something
>approaching that length without tripod (in spite of Gary Reese's test
>results on the combo).
I just tried the 135mm f2.8 (w/ & wo 2x Vivitar) this past weekend for the
same reason(s) John describes and found it to work very well for me. No
mono or tripod used.
________________
John Cwiklinski
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|