Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM-4T vs. OM-4 as backup body

Subject: Re: [OM] OM-4T vs. OM-4 as backup body
From: "Rand E." <rtomcala@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 16:16:03 -0400
On this topic, Is there any way (short of disassembly) to determine
whether an OM4 has the new low battery drain circuit board.  Battery
drain tells you if you have the problem, having the new circuit board
tells you if you are susceptible to the problem in the future.
Rand E.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jim Terazawa wrote:
> 
> Chris,
> 
> If I were you, I would get the 4Ti.  The 4 supposedly have higher
> battery drain current than the 4Ti(4T) and the 4 is out of production.
> 
> Jim Terazawa
> 
> "Riek, Christopher" wrote:
> 
> > I'm looking to get a backup body for my OM-4t, and I'm undecided
> > about going with the OM-4T or just a plain OM-4. From pouring
> > through the SIF pages and the FAQ, it seems to me that the only
> > differences between the OM-4t and the OM-4 are the Titanium
> > top and bottom plates (obviously), support for the F280, and some
> > buzzer/display things. Granted that I do have an F280, but I don't
> > use the high-speed sync all that often. Given that this camera will
> > be a backup (alternate film and/or lens) Is it really worth the extra
> > money to get the OM-4T over the OM-4? I'd appreciate some other
> > opinions. (I know there is no shortage of these on the list ;-)
> > -Chris Riek
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz