Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] OM-4T vs. OM-4 as backup body

Subject: [OM] OM-4T vs. OM-4 as backup body
From: Jim Terazawa <jimt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 13:30:06 -0500
Chris,

If I were you, I would get the 4Ti.  The 4 supposedly have higher
battery drain current than the 4Ti(4T) and the 4 is out of production.

Jim Terazawa

"Riek, Christopher" wrote:

> I'm looking to get a backup body for my OM-4t, and I'm undecided
> about going with the OM-4T or just a plain OM-4. From pouring
> through the SIF pages and the FAQ, it seems to me that the only
> differences between the OM-4t and the OM-4 are the Titanium
> top and bottom plates (obviously), support for the F280, and some
> buzzer/display things. Granted that I do have an F280, but I don't
> use the high-speed sync all that often. Given that this camera will
> be a backup (alternate film and/or lens) Is it really worth the extra
> money to get the OM-4T over the OM-4? I'd appreciate some other
> opinions. (I know there is no shortage of these on the list ;-)
> -Chris Riek


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz