| Subject: | RE: [OM] How many aperture blades on 50/2 macro? |
|---|---|
| From: | "Harridge, Wayne" <Wayne.Harridge@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Feb 2000 16:11:42 +0800 |
John L wrote: > > Did you mean that the Leitz design was similar to one of the > Carl Zeiss > ones? Many other lens makers (some of them very good ones) copied the > basics of Carl Zeiss designs as patents ran out on them; the Tessar in > particular. > I thought the Elmar was basically a Tessar design, true ? Wayne Harridge Ivanhoe, Victoria, Australia http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Louvre/6152/ < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 55mm F1.2, Giles |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RE :[OM] EXTENSION FOR 20mm MACRO, Frank van Lindert |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: [OM] How many aperture blades on 50/2 macro?, Paul Wallich |
| Next by Thread: | OT: Defamation (was RE: [OM] Interesting item on eBay web site item#252885791: OLYMPUS OM4 35MM BODY WOW <<LOOK>>), Jan Steinman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |