Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] (Fwd) wildflower macro

Subject: Re: [OM] (Fwd) wildflower macro
From: "C.H.Ling" <pling@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 11:07:15 +0800
Yes, with the 90/2 alone the quality may be similar to 135/4.5 but 135/4.5 has 
longer
working distance. If you add tube to the 90/2 to get higher magnification, I 
think
the 80/4 with 65-116 will give better result. 

C.H.Ling

Giles wrote:
> 
> You could also consider the Zuiko 90mm f2 macro and 65-116 auto extension
> tube.  I think this would be a more versatile combination as the 90mm
> could in most circumstances be used without the 65-116 while the 135 can
> not.  Also, this combination would be easier to focus and have performance
> that should at least equal that of the 135mm f4.5 macro.
> 
> I agree about things of high quality.
> 
> Giles
> 
> tatu_laitinen@xxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > A better idea is to get both 80mm f4 and 135mm f4.5 macros on 65-116 
> > extension. They are a bit more slower to use
> > than 90mm macros, but the results are simply fantastic! If you are really 
> > serious about close-up/macro photography
> 
> > In a longer run its much wiser to invest on higher quality (more expensive) 
> > equipment than to buy cheap products
> > that will not last for long.
> >

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz