Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] lens comparasons

Subject: RE: [OM] lens comparasons
From: Dave Bulger <dbulger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 20:28:06 -0600
Waaaal,

This Texas boy ain't too bright, so I've got to keep it simple.

The 100/2 gives me excellent results.  The 24/2 gives me excellent results. 
 Since I'm lucky enough to be able to shoot exclusively for my own 
pleasure, this is all I need.

The heck with the numbers, Zuiks!  It's the photographs that count!

Dave

On Thursday, January 27, 2000 6:30 PM, John A. Prosper 
[SMTP:prosper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 Pauls0627@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> |In a message dated 01/27/2000 5:21:22 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> |geanders@xxxxxxxxx writes:
> |
> |> >OM 100/2 - 3.9
> |>  >Canon 100/2 - 4.2
> |>  >Minolta 100/2 - 4.4
> |>  >Nikon 105/2.5 - 4.2
> |>  >Leica Apo-Macro-Elmarit-R 100/2.8 - 4.5
> |>  >
> |>  >OM 90/2M - 4.2
> |>  >Leica Summicron-M 90/2 - 4.3
> |>  >Tokina AT-X 90/2.5 - 4.6
> |>  >Tamron SP 90/2.5 - 4.2
> |>  >Contax G Sonnar 90/2.8 - 4.4
> |
> |Geez, I hope the list doesn't get into an uproar over this one.

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz