Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] lens comparasons

Subject: Re: [OM] lens comparasons
From: "george" <geanders@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 16:01:43 -0800
Paul;

The quote below is from Dirk, not me.

But I am preparing a treatise on the subject.

george




>In a message dated 01/27/2000 5:21:22 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>geanders@xxxxxxxxx writes:
>
>> >OM 100/2 - 3.9
>>  >Canon 100/2 - 4.2
>>  >Minolta 100/2 - 4.4
>>  >Nikon 105/2.5 - 4.2
>>  >Leica Apo-Macro-Elmarit-R 100/2.8 - 4.5
>>  >
>>  >OM 90/2M - 4.2
>>  >Leica Summicron-M 90/2 - 4.3
>>  >Tokina AT-X 90/2.5 - 4.6
>>  >Tamron SP 90/2.5 - 4.2
>>  >Contax G Sonnar 90/2.8 - 4.4
>
>Geez, I hope the list doesn't get into an uproar over this one. They test
all
>the lenses at infinity, for starters. Why test a macro lens at infinity?
They
>also don't consider distortion, flare, or contrast in the MTF number.
>
>I like my 100/2. It gives me great images. So does my 24/2, in fact. I
don't
>even care if their prices on the used market just went down significantly.
>They aren't for sale!
>
>Paul Schings
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz