. And yes even Olympus equipment gets heavy as with all this and the
>> other stuff that is in my case it weighs 50+ pounds. John Gettis
>
>Ouch! Thats' one of the reasons I got interested in Oly: light bodies and
>lenses to save my surgically repaired back. Guess I'll have to be
especially
>careful in choosing just those lenses that suit my needs. Thankfully, I've
>never been a long tele kind of guy--not yet, at least. I'm thinking
something
>like 24, 28 or 35, 50, 85 or 100, 200, with at least one macro in there
Sounds good. Maybe a little change suggestion?: 21/3.5; 28/2; any 50;
Zuiko90/2 (takes care of your macro desires and eliminates the 85 or 100 or
Tamron quandary with a lens better than any of them) 200/4 or 200/5 (or even
100-200/5) That's a really capable system.
>somewhere. Maybe the Tamron 90. And a 1.4 tele extender.
Be careful here, none of the lenses either of us listed will mate with the
Zuiko 1.4X.
george
And a flash. And
>two bodies. Gosh, it adds up doesn't it? Guess I'll have to get out of
the
>habit of taking along everything I own.
>John
>
>>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|