| Subject: | Re: [OM] "perfect" film for OM2n?? |
|---|---|
| From: | Frank Ernens <fgernens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 11 Dec 1999 14:02:07 +1100 |
Tom Trottier wrote > - film - - ISO - - Setting - - Stops difference - > Kodak.Kodachrome.64 64 50 0.4 Kodachrome 64 is best rated at 64 in both the OM-2 and normal cameras... the table is incorrect for this at least (and yes, I make exposures longer than 1/60 on auto too). To me, OTF is "mostly harmless." < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] Re: 200mm primes, Ángel Lobo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Greenish viewfinder image - is this unusual?, Chuck Norcutt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] "perfect" film for OM2n??, Dirk Wright |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] I'm back again, Jim Terazawa |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |