Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] The New Kid On The Block

Subject: Re: [OM] The New Kid On The Block
From: Jim Mueller <webnik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 21:57:11 -0600
Thanks for the quick review of the 2000. The shutter stop-down/mirror lock-up
sequence seems superior to the manual mirror lock up of the OM-1. It would be
ideal for astro-photography, which I am clumsily learning.

Question is....should I buy more lenses for my OM-1 or buy a 2000? Perhaps I
should wait until I get my auction money from ebay first. But then again, I 
could
use plastic and pay it off later.....hmmmm.


jim

Joel Wilcox wrote:

> At 12:20 PM 11/10/1999 -0600, you wrote:
> >BTW: What's the consensus on the OM-2000? I saw the body and 35-70 zoom for
> >$200 at Camera World. Seemed like a decent deal. The spot metering, aluminum
> >body, and nice finish looks appealing. The lens looks cheap.
> >
> >Regards
> >
> >jim mueller
> >
>
> Hi Jim and welcome. Consensus?  What's that? <g>
>
> The OM2000 works very well for me.  It doesn't seem anything like a
> traditional OM camera.  If you insist on having shutter speed ring on the
> lens mount, you'll never cotton to this camera.  The meters work very well.
>  There is a shutter lock on it which I think is darn near a factory defect,
> but this is easily modified without wrecking any parts.
>
> No motor/winder capability or interchangeable screens. Viewfinder seems
> brighter than an OM-1, not quite as bright as an OM-2S/4T with a 2-series
> screen (which are newer, brighter screens -- but you can't use them in your
> OM-1 without some mods to the screen tab and probably your meter calibration).
>
> The self-timer gives mirror lockup and aperture stop down and can be cocked
> to fire after variable numbers of seconds.  I've gotten exposures in 2-3
> seconds, which I find to be superior in its usefulness to the self-timer on
> the OM-2S and OM-4T, which can only shoot after running through its 10-12
> second sequence (unless you shut the timer off mid-sequence), although the
> mechanism on the OM2000 is a lot less sophisticated than on those other
> cameras.  (Sorry, that was quite a sentence.)
>
> I'd skip the lens, from what I've heard.
>
>
> Joel Wilcox
> Iowa City, Iowa USA
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >





< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz