Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] Portrait Lens

Subject: RE: [OM] Portrait Lens
From: "Elmer Brum" <elmerb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 12:10:10 -0400
Thanks for the advice.

Regards,

Elmer Brum
Toronto, Canada
[mailto:] elmerb@xxxxxxxxxxxx

-----Original Message-----
From:   owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of *- DORIS FANG -*
Sent:   Sunday, August 29, 1999 8:35 AM
To:     'Olympus List'
Subject:        Re: [OM] Portrait Lens



On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Elmer Brum wrote:

> Any suggestions?
>  I guess I should start out
> with a good portraiture lens, any suggestions?

   A lot depends on the way you do portraits, what sort of perspective you
favor, DOF, your working room, etc. etc. There's lots of lenses in the OM
line-up that will do just fine for portraiture. Don't forget that
Cartier-Bresson did most of his portraits (which tend to be environmental)
with a 50mm.
  So..in the OM line-up...you'd have the family of 50's (1.8, 2.0, 1.4,
1.2), the 85/2, 90/2, 100/2.8 & 2.0, 135/3.5 & 2.8, 180/2.8 & 2.0,
200/4, the 35-70's, 35-80, 35-105, 75-150, 65-200, 100-200, 85-250 etc.

   But I'd recommend --- unless you have specific requirements ---
   the 85/2.0, 100/2.8 or 100/2.0

                                    *= Doris Fang =*


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz